I've already got a paper that I'm working on revising; it's 13 pages long, so it's quite a bit to bite off for anyone giving me comments. What I'd like to look at, in part, is the way that I make assertions in the paper as a stand-in for the reader, when in fact the reader might not agree with the assertions I am making. I intend to take lines and phrases from the paper so that my peers can give me feedback on whether those assertions hold up, or whether they are really only the opinions of the writer (me). So, the "new media" component would be the method of polling my peers and integrating feedback into the paper.
Also, because the paper is about a film - itself a comparatively "new medium," I think the arguments in the paper already address new media concepts, and I will continue to develop those.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Quick thoughts on my 2nd paper
Labels:
brainstorming,
film,
introduction,
paper 2,
polls,
Terje Vigen,
Victor Sjostrom
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment